Mössbauer Spectroscopy: Isomer Shift

⚛️ Mössbauer Spectroscopy - Isomer Shift ($\delta$)

The Isomer Shift ($\delta$), also known as Chemical Shift, is one of the most fundamental parameters in Mössbauer spectroscopy. It measures the shift of the entire Mössbauer spectrum relative to a standard source. It is sensitive to the electron density at the nucleus and thus provides information about the oxidation state and covalent character of the bond.

---

I. Origin and Formula

The Isomer Shift originates from the electrostatic interaction between the charge distribution of the nucleus and the s-electron density at the nuclear surface.

🔑 The Isomer Shift Formula

The shift ($\delta$) is determined by two factors: the difference in s-electron density between the absorber and the source, and the difference in the nuclear radii between the excited and ground states.

$$\delta \propto \left( |\psi_s(0)|_{\text{absorber}}^2 - |\psi_s(0)|_{\text{source}}^2 \right) \left( R_{\text{ex}}^2 - R_{\text{gr}}^2 \right)$$

• $|\psi_s(0)|^2$: The s-electron probability density at the nucleus.
• $R_{\text{ex}}$ and $R_{\text{gr}}$: Nuclear radii of the excited and ground states.

---

II. The Critical $\text{Fe}^{57}$ Relationship

For $\text{Fe}^{57}$, the excited state radius ($R_{\text{ex}}$) is smaller than the ground state radius ($R_{\text{gr}}$). This makes the nuclear factor $\mathbf{(R_{\text{ex}}^2 - R_{\text{gr}}^2)}$ negative.

This negative nuclear factor leads to the inverse relationship between electron density and $\delta$:

• $\text{Higher } s\text{-electron density} \implies \text{More negative (smaller)} \ \delta$
• $\text{Lower } s\text{-electron density} \implies \text{More positive (larger)} \ \delta$

---

$\text{Fe}^{57}$ vs. $\text{Sn}^{119}$: The Critical Difference

The sign of the nuclear factor $\mathbf{(R_{\text{ex}}^2 - R_{\text{gr}}^2)}$ determines the relationship between electron density and $\delta$.

Nuclide	Radius Change ($R_{\text{ex}} - R_{\text{gr}}$)	Nuclear Factor Sign	Relationship: $\delta$ vs. $s$-Density
$\mathbf{^{57}\text{Fe}}$	Negative ($R_{\text{ex}} < R_{\text{gr}}$)	Negative	Inverse: Higher density $\implies$ Lower ($\delta$)
$\mathbf{^{119}\text{Sn}}$	Positive ($R_{\text{ex}} > R_{\text{gr}}$)	Positive	Direct: Higher density $\implies$ Higher ($\delta$)

III. Dependence on Oxidation State ($\text{Fe}^{2+}$ vs. $\text{Fe}^{3+}$ vs. $\text{Fe}^{4+}$)

The most significant factor affecting $s$-electron density is the number of $3d$ electrons, which act as shielding agents.

1. Shielding Effect ($3d$ vs. $4s$)

• $3d$-electrons are highly effective at shielding the inner $s$-electrons from the nuclear charge.
• When the number of $3d$-electrons decreases (i.e., oxidation state increases: $\text{Fe}^{2+} \rightarrow \text{Fe}^{4+}$), the shielding is reduced.
• Reduced shielding pulls the $s$-electrons closer to the nucleus, increasing the $s$-electron density ($|\psi_s(0)|^2$).

2. Isomer Shift Order for Iron

Since $\delta$ is inversely related to $s$-electron density:

Iron Ion	$3d$ Electrons	$s$-Electron Density ($|\psi_s(0)|^2$)	Isomer Shift ($\delta$)
$\text{Fe}(\text{II})$	Highest (e.g., $d^6$)	Lowest (Highest shielding)	Highest (Most positive)
$\text{Fe}(\text{III})$	Intermediate (e.g., $d^5$)	Intermediate	Intermediate
$\text{Fe}(\text{IV})$	Lowest (e.g., $d^4$)	Highest (Lowest shielding)	Lowest (Most negative)

Correct Order of Isomer Shift ($\delta$): $$\mathbf{\text{Fe}(\text{II}) > \text{Fe}(\text{III}) > \text{Fe}(\text{IV})}$$

More 3d electrons → More shielding → Less s-density at nucleus → Higher ($\delta$).
Standard Order for Iron ($\delta$ values):
Fe(I) (d⁷) > Fe(II) (d⁶) > Fe(III) (d⁵) > Fe(IV) (d⁴)

---

IV. Dependence on Covalency (High Spin vs. Low Spin)

Covalency also influences the $s$-electron density, providing a way to distinguish between high-spin and low-spin complexes of the same oxidation state.

Factor	Effect on Electron Density ($\mathbf{s}$)	Effect on Isomer Shift ($\mathbf{\delta}$)
Increased Covalency (Stronger $\sigma$-donation from ligand)	Removes $s$ and $p$ density from $\text{Fe}$ (decreases $s$-density)	Increases $\delta$ (More positive)
High Spin vs. Low Spin (e.g., $\text{Fe}^{3+}$)	Low Spin (more $\pi$-backbonding/covalency)	Lower $\delta$ than High Spin

Therefore, for $\text{Fe}^{3+}$ (a $d^5$ ion):

$$\delta_{\text{High Spin}} > \delta_{\text{Low Spin}}$$

Tin ($\text{Sn}^{119}$) Trend (Key Exam Comparison!)

Increasing oxidation state ($\text{Sn}^{2+} \rightarrow \text{Sn}^{4+}$) means the $5s$ electrons (lone pair in $\text{Sn}^{2+}$) are lost. Losing the $5s^2$ electrons means Less shielding $\implies$ Higher $s$-density (specifically for $\text{Sn}^{4+}$). Due to the direct relationship for $\text{Sn}^{119}$, this results in a Higher $\delta$ value.

Tin Ion	Valence Configuration	Shielding	$s$-Density ($|\psi_s(0)|^2$)	Isomer Shift ($\delta$)
$\text{Sn}^{2+}$	$5s^2 5p^0$	Highest (Lone pair)	Lowest	Lowest (Most negative)
$\text{Sn}^{4+}$	$5s^0 5p^0$	None (Empty shell)	Highest	Highest (Most positive)

CSIE-NET, GATE, SLET Level MCQs

Q: The correct order of the isomeric shift ($\delta$) in Mössbauer spectra ($^{57}$Fe source) for high-spin iron compounds is:
A) Fe(II) > Fe(III) > Fe(IV)
B) Fe(III) > Fe(II) > Fe(IV)
C) Fe(IV) > Fe(III) > Fe(II)
D) Fe(IV) > Fe(II) > Fe(III)
Answer: (A) Fe(II) > Fe(III) > Fe(IV)
Logic:
Fe(II) is 3d⁶ (High shielding, Low s-density at nucleus → High $\delta$)
Fe(III) is 3d⁵ (Less shielding, Higher s-density → Lower $\delta$)
Fe(IV) is 3d⁴ (Least shielding, Highest s-density → Lowest $\delta$)

Q: How does the Isomer Shift of an Iron complex change when a strong $\sigma-donor$ $\pi-acceptor$ ligand (like CN$^-$ or CO) replaces a weak ligand (like H$_2$O)?
A) $\delta$ increases
B) $\delta$ decreases
C) $\delta$ remains unchanged
D) Becomes zero
Answer: (B) $\delta$ decreases
Logic:
$\pi$-acceptor ligands remove electron density from metal d-orbitals (back bonding).
Removal of d-electrons → Reduced shielding of s-electrons.
Reduced shielding → Increased s-electron density at the nucleus.
For $^{57}$Fe (where $\Delta$ R/R is negative), increased s-density leads to a decrease in $\delta$.

Q: In the $^{119}$Sn Mössbauer spectrum, which species is expected to have the highest positive isomer shift?
A) SnCl$_4$
B) Sn(IV) oxide
C) SnCl$_2$
D) Organotin(IV)
Answer: (C) SnCl$_2$
Logic:
Sn(II) (in SnCl$_2$) retains its 5s$^2$ pair (high s-density).
Sn(IV) species (A, B, D) have lost the 5s electrons (5s$^0$).
For Sn, $\Delta$ R/R is positive, so high s-density = high positive shift.

Q. The chemical shifts of Fe(II) and Sn²⁺ are positive because of the reasons:

A) $\frac{\Delta r}{r}$ is positive
B) $\frac{\Delta r}{r}$ is negative
C) $s$ electron density at the nucleus is high
D) $s$ electron density at the nucleus is low

Options	Fe(II)	Sn2+
A)	A & C	B & D
B)	B & D	A & C
C)	A & D	B & C
D)	B & C	A & D

Answer: (B) Fe(II) is B & D, and Sn²⁺ is A & C.

Mössbauer Spectroscopy - Isomer Shift Analysis

The Isomer Shift (Chemical Shift, $\delta$) is given by the formula:

$$\delta = K \left[ \frac{\Delta r}{r} \right] (\rho_{a}(0) - \rho_{s}(0))$$

For the shift $\delta$ to be positive, the two terms in the brackets must have the same sign.

---

Fe(II) Analysis ($^{57}\text{Fe}$):

1. Nuclear Term: For $^{57}\text{Fe}$, the term $\frac{\Delta r}{r}$ is negative (B).

2. Electron Term: Fe(II) ($3d^6$) has higher $d$-electron density than Fe(III). The increased $d$-electron shielding reduces the $s$-electron density at the nucleus ($\rho_{a}(0)$ is lower). To make $\delta > 0$: $$\delta = (\text{Negative}) \times (\rho_{a}(0) - \rho_{s}(0)) > 0$$ This requires the electron density difference $(\rho_{a}(0) - \rho_{s}(0))$ to be negative. This means $\rho_{a}(0)$ is low compared to the source, corresponding to low $s$ electron density at the nucleus (D).

Conclusion for Fe(II): B & D

---

Sn²⁺ Analysis ($^{119}\text{Sn}$):

1. Nuclear Term: For $^{119}\text{Sn}$, the term $\frac{\Delta r}{r}$ is positive (A).

2. Electron Term: Sn²⁺ ($5s^2$) has two valence $s$-electrons, leading to a much higher $s$-electron density at the nucleus ($\rho_{a}(0)$ is higher) compared to Sn⁴⁺ ($5s^0$). To make $\delta > 0$: $$\delta = (\text{Positive}) \times (\rho_{a}(0) - \rho_{s}(0)) > 0$$ This requires the electron density difference $(\rho_{a}(0) - \rho_{s}(0))$ to be positive. This corresponds to high $s$ electron density at the nucleus (C).

Conclusion for Sn²⁺: A & C

---

The correct option is (b): Fe(II) is B & D, and Sn²⁺ is A & C.

Q: In low spin complexes of Fe(II) and Fe(III), the isomer shifts values are
A) Fe(II) > Fe(III) both are Positive
B) Fe(III) > Fe(II) both are negative
C) both are almost equal and negative
D) both are almost equal and positive

Answer:
Mössbauer Isomer Shift ($\delta$) Analysis for Low Spin Iron

The isomer shift ($\delta$) for $^{57}\text{Fe}$ is determined by the electron density at the nucleus ($\rho(0)$) and the nuclear term $\left[ \frac{\Delta r}{r} \right]$:

$$\delta = K \left[ \frac{\Delta r}{r} \right] (\rho_{a}(0) - \rho_{s}(0))$$

For $^{57}\text{Fe}$, the nuclear term $\left[ \frac{\Delta r}{r} \right]$ is negative.

This means the isomer shift is inversely proportional to the electron density at the nucleus:

$$\delta \propto - \rho_{a}(0)$$

---

Comparison of Electron Density ($\rho(0)$):

1. Low Spin Fe(II) ($d^6$): The $3d$ shell is fully occupied ($t_{2g}^6 e_g^0$). The six $d$-electrons provide maximum shielding of the $s$-electrons from the nucleus. This leads to a relatively low $s$-electron density at the nucleus. $$\rho(\text{Low Spin Fe(II)}) \text{ is LOW}$$ 2. Low Spin Fe(III) ($d^5$): The $3d$ shell is partially occupied ($t_{2g}^5 e_g^0$). With one less $d$-electron than Fe(II), there is less shielding of the $s$-electrons. This leads to a relatively high $s$-electron density at the nucleus. $$\rho(\text{Low Spin Fe(III)}) \text{ is HIGH}$$

Therefore, the electron density order is: $\rho(\text{III}) > \rho(\text{II})$.

Conclusion on Isomer Shift ($\delta$):

Since $\delta$ is inversely proportional to $\rho(0)$:

$$\delta(\text{Low Spin Fe(II)}) > \delta(\text{Low Spin Fe(III)})$$

While the absolute values for strong-field low-spin iron complexes are often negative when referenced against a standard iron foil, the relative order of the magnitude must be $\text{Fe(II)} > \text{Fe(III)}$. Option (a) correctly states this relative order.

The correct option is (a): Fe(II) > Fe(III).